Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Published: 2020-08-15

The relative effect of CXWORXTM versus TabataTM group exercise programs on body mass index, body composition, predicted VO2max and body image in adult exercisers

School of Health Sciences and Human Movement Colorado State University-Pueblo, Pueblo, 81001, Colorado, United States of America
School of Health Sciences and Human Movement Colorado State University-Pueblo, Pueblo, 81001, Colorado, United States of America
School of Health Sciences and Human Movement Colorado State University-Pueblo, Pueblo, 81001, Colorado, United States of America
Choreographed exercise High intensity interval Continuous training

Abstract

In this present work we took an initiation to compares the effects of two common approaches to group exercise: CXWORXTM and TabataTM , which employ differing exercise strategies, on common fitness measures and psychological perceptions.  The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of TabataTM versus CXWORXTM on body mass index (BMI), body composition, maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) and Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire (MBSRQ) measured self-perceptions in adult exercisers. The mixed gender sample consisted of a sub-set of 10 adult cross fit exercisers and 10 students from a regional comprehensive university class randomized to each exercise program. Analysis of Variance was used to examine program effects. While no significant main effect of the training period on body composition or BMI was found; mean VO2max was significantly increased as a large main effect across the study groups (F=1.054, P<0.05, η2 =0.533) without significant interaction. In addition, there was a significant large interactive effect of the training program and time to increase MBSRQ scores for appearance evaluation (F=1.648, P<0.05, η2 = 0.367), appearance orientation (F=1.447, P<0.05,  η2 = 0.377), fitness evaluation (F=1.637, P<0.05, η2 = 0.557), and body areas satisfaction (F=2.744, P<0.05, η2 = 0.533), in the CXWORXTM  group in comparison with the TabataTM group.  In conclusion, participants who completed a CXWORXTM exercise program increase VO2max similarly to participants who complete a TabataTM exercise program, while also reporting significant improvements in body image scores which the TabataTM participants did not. Neither program had a significant effect on body composition or BMI.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Joanne Hudson, Jonathan R.Males, John H.Kerr, Reversal theory-based sport and exercise research: A systematic/narrative review." Psychology of Sport and Exercise 27 (2016): 168-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.08.008
  2. Zoran Milanović, Goran Sporiš, Matthew Weston, Effectiveness of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIT) and Continuous Endurance Training for VO2max Improvements: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials, Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) vol. 45 (2015) 1469-1481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0365-0
  3. Romeo B Batacan Jr, Mitch J Duncan, Vincent J Dalbo, Patrick S Tucker, Andrew S Fenning, Effects of high-intensity interval training on cardiometabolic health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies, British Journal of Sports Medicine, 51 (2017) 494-503. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-095841
  4. T.F. Cash, Multidimensional Body–Self Relations Questionnaire (MBSRQ), In Encyclopedia of feeding and eating disorders 2015 (pp. 1-4).
  5. Thomas F Cash, Multidimensional body-self relations questionnaire (MBSRQ), Norfolk, VA: Author (2000).
  6. M. Cao, M. Quan, J. Zhuang, Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 16 (2019) 1533. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091533
  7. Hunter Bennett, Gaynor Parfitt, Kade Davison, Roger Eston, Validity of Submaximal Step Tests to Estimate Maximal Oxygen Uptake in Healthy Adults, Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 46 (2016) 737-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0445-1
  8. William D McArdle, Frank I. Katch, and Victor L. Katch. Exercise physiology: nutrition, energy, and human performance. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2010.
  9. M. Wewege, R. van den Berg, R.E. Ward, A. Keech, The effects of high-intensity interval training vs. moderate-intensity continuous training on body composition in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Obesity Reviews : An Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 18 (2017) 635-646. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12532
  10. Bushman, Barbara, and American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM's Complete Guide to Fitness & Health, 2E. Human Kinetics, (2017).
  11. Joseph E Donnelly, Steven N Blair, John M Jakicic, Melinda M Manore, Janet W Rankin, Bryan K Smith, American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. Appropriate physical activity intervention strategies for weight loss and prevention of weight regain for adults, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 41 (2009) 459-471. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181949333
  12. Carl Foster, Courtney V. Farland, Flavia Guidotti, Michelle Harbin, Brianna Roberts, Jeff Schuette, Andrew Tuuri, Scott T. Doberstein, and John P. Porcari, The Effects of High Intensity Interval Training vs Steady State Training on Aerobic and Anaerobic Capacity, Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 14 (2015) 747-755.
  13. Littrell, Ashley, The Relationship Between Body Image and Exercise Type, (2017). https://dc.etsu.edu/honors/366/
  14. Martin J Gibala, High-intensity interval training: a time-efficient strategy for health promotion?, Current Sports Medicine Reports, 6 (2007) 211-213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CSMR.0000306472.95337.e9
  15. Sarah J. Hardcastle, Hannah Ray, Louisa Beale and Martin S. Hagger, Why sprint interval training is inappropriate for a largely sedentary population, Frontiers in Psychology, 5 (2014) 1505. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01505
  16. Jung, Mary E., Jessica E. Bourne, and Jonathan P. Little, Where does HIT fit? An examination of the affective response to high-intensity intervals in comparison to continuous moderate-and continuous vigorous-intensity exercise in the exercise intensity affect continuum, PloS One, 9 (2014) e114541. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114541
  17. Bruno R. R. Oliveira, Fabian A. Slama, Andréa C. Deslandes, Elen S. Furtado, Tony M. Santos, Continuous and high-intensity interval training: which promotes higher pleasure?, PloS One, 8 (2013) e79965. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079965
  18. Nicole Olney, Timothy Wertz, Zachary LaPorta, Adam Mora, Jasmine Serbas, Todd A Astorino, Comparison of Acute Physiological and Psychological Response Between Moderate-Intensity Continuous Exercise and Three Regimes of High-Intensity Interval Training, Journal of strength and conditioning research vol. 32,8 (2018) 2130-2138. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002154
  19. Álvaro Sicilia, Piedad Sáenz-Alvarez, David González-Cutre, Roberto Ferriz,, Social Physique Anxiety and Intention to Be Physically Active: A Self-Determination Theory Approach, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 87 (2016) 354-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2016.1213351
  20. N. Ntoumanis, S.J. Biddle, A review of motivational climate in physical activity, Journal of Sports Sciences, 17 (1999) 643-665. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404199365678

How to Cite

Twilleger, T., Dallam, G. M., & Foust, C. P. (2020). The relative effect of CXWORXTM versus TabataTM group exercise programs on body mass index, body composition, predicted VO2max and body image in adult exercisers. International Journal of Physical Education, Fitness and Sports, 9(3), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.34256/ijpefs2031