Vol 7 No 4 (2018): Volume 7, Issue 4, Year 2018
Articles

A Comparison of the Technique of the 180° Cutting Maneuver Performed on Grass and on a Hardwood Floor

Brad Gerbrandt
Winnipeg Police Fitness Testing Unit, Winnipeg, MB
Bio
Marion Joyce Alexander
Faculty of Kinesiology and Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.
Bio
David Telles-Langdon
Gupta Faculty of Kinesiology and Sport Studies, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, MB.
Bio
Published December 17, 2018
Keywords
  • 505 agility drill,
  • change of direction,
  • 180 degree cut
How to Cite
Gerbrandt, B., Alexander, M. J., & Telles-Langdon, D. (2018). A Comparison of the Technique of the 180° Cutting Maneuver Performed on Grass and on a Hardwood Floor. International Journal of Physical Education, Fitness and Sports, 7(4), 22-35. https://doi.org/10.26524/ijpefs1843

Plum Analytics

Abstract

The 180º cutting maneuver (also known as the 505 drill) is commonly seen in field and court sports, and it consists of a 15 m run up to a turning point, followed by a timed stop and 180º change of direction for 5 m. The purpose of this study was to determine the most effective joint movements, limb velocities and body positions to perform the 180º cutting maneuver.  Additionally, the study compared the kinematics of the 505 drill performed indoors while wearing running shoes and outdoors while wearing cleats.  For this study, twelve athletes executed the 505 drill indoors while wearing running shoes, and twelve executed the 505 drill outdoors while wearing cleats.  Fifty nine independent variables were measured for each athlete and compared to the athlete’s time to complete the test.  Mean test time was 2.27 seconds for the indoor group and a significantly lower 2.47 s for the outdoor group. Correlation analysis and forward stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed on both groups to determine which variables were significantly related to test time.  Trunk forward lean at push off of the jab leg was most highly correlated to test time for the indoor athletes (r= -0.887), however, flexion at maximum flexion of the jab knee was most highly correlated to test time for the outdoor group (r= -0.748).  Outdoor athletes could benefit from assuming a lower and more flexed body position similar to the indoor athletes and attain a greater degree of trunk lean at jab leg touchdown.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. J. Draper, M.G. Lancaster, The 505 test: A test for agility in the horizontal plane, The Australian Journal for Science and Medicine in Sport, 17 (1985) 15-18.
  2. J. Hewit, J. Cronin, P. Hume, Understanding change of direction performance: a technical analysis of a 180º ground-based turn and sprint task, International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 7 (2012) 493-501.
  3. W.B. Young, M.H. McDowell, B.J. Scarlett, Specificity of sprint and agility training methods, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 15 (2001) 315-319.
  4. R.J. Wood, The 505 agility test. Rob's Home of Fitness Testing, [cited September 26, 2016; Available from: http://www.topendsports.com/testing/tests/505.htm, (2005).
  5. M. Jovanovic, Random thoughts on the 505 agility test and 30-15 intermittent field test, Complementary Training January 2018]; Available from: http://complementarytraining.net/random-thoughts/, (2012).
  6. Dartfish, Dartfish Digital Video Analysis System, [cited 2014 02/14]; Available from: http://www.dartfish.com/, (2014).
  7. T.H. Hassard, St Louis, MO, Mosby Year Book, Understanding Biostatistics, (1991).
  8. S.R. Narum, Beyond Bonferroni: less conservative analyses for conservation genetics, Conservation Genetics, 7 (2006) 783-787.
  9. C. Goodman, Improving agility techniques, National Strength and Conditioning Association’s Performance Training Journal, 7 (2008) 10-12.
  10. T.D. Calahan, M.E. Johnson, S. Liu, Y.S. Chao, Quantitative measurements of hip strength in different age groups, Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research, 246 (1989) 135-145.
  11. A.J. Cheng, C.L. Rice, Fatigue and recovery of power and isometric torque following isotonic knee extensions, Journal of Applied Physiology, 99 (2005) 1446-1452 .
  12. I. Jeffreys, Movement training for football, United Kingdom Strength and Conditioning Association, 2 (2008) 14-23.
  13. M. Sayers, Running techniques for running rugby, Applied Sports Knowledge, (1998) 1-9.
  14. M. Sayers, Running technique for field sports players, Sports Coach, 23 (2000) 26-27.
  15. J.M. Sheppard, W.B. Young, T.L.A. Doyle, T.A. Sheppard, R.U. Newton , An evaluation of a new test of reactive agility and its relationship to sprint speed and change of direction speed, Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 9 (2006) 342-349.
  16. G. Cook, Athletic body in balance, Human Kinetics, (2003).
  17. H. Stucke, W. Baudzus, W. Bauman, On friction characteristics of playing surfaces, in Sport Shoes and Playing Surfaces, E.C. Frederick, Editor, Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL. p. 87-97. 1984.
  18. N. Bezodis, G. Trewartha, C. Wilson, G. Irwin, Contributions of the non-kicking-side arm to rugby place-kicking technique, Sports Biomechanics, 6 (2007) 171-186.
  19. M. Rippetoe, N. Delgadillo, B. Carter, N. Sims, P. Troupos, M. Reynolds, Starting strength, Aasgaard Company, (2018), Wichita Falls, TX.
  20. R.M. Enoka, Neuro mechanics of Human Movement-5th edition, Human Kinetics, (2015).